Kolb's learning cycle for professional development of employees


Kolb's Experiential Learning Cycle (ELC)

Kolb suggests his learning cycle for effective learning, and individuals should undergo all four stages of the educational cycle as shown in Fig. 1(Kolb, 1974). The learner can enter the cycle at any stage( Kolb and Boyatwzis, 1999). Kolb's ELC provides the chance to complete activities for every learning vogue, matching an individual's learning vogue preferences (McLeod, 2010).





                                                                                                                    Fig.01



The four stages are,

 1.Concrete experience: In the initial stage of the cycle, an individual come across  a new experience. This could be planned or accidental.

2. Reflective observation: In the second stage, the individual reviews on the experience prior to make any judgements.  

3.Abstract conceptualization: In abstract conceptualization, the person implements theories and new ideas based on the experience.

 4.Active experimentation: Finally , people apply what they learned within the experiences to different scenarios. They use their theories to resolve issues, create choices and influence events. 


Kolb's learning styles

Kolb's learning vogue is explained in two dimensions:  An individual understands and processes the knowledge. 

1.Diverging: People of this type of learning vogue consider things from a completely different perspective. They like to look and study, conjointly they need imagination capability, emotional, sturdy in arts, like better to add teams, open-minded to require feedback and they have a broad interest in several cultures and other people.

2.Assimilating: People of this type of learning vogues like smart clear information and they'll logically format the given information and explore analytic models. They're fascinated by ideas and abstracts.

3.Converging: This style of learners solve issues. They apply their learning to sensible problems. Also, they like technical tasks, and that they experiment with new ideas. they have an inclination to be unemotional.

4.Accommodating: People with this type of learning vogue like better to understand things much. They're interested in new challenges and solve issues intuitively. 


Global context

Kolb's ELC is usually used to analyze variations within the learning of numerous schools or employee teams globally. Most of the professional development programs carried out in worldwide organizations to respond to the whims of technology and the increased technology. Applications of Kolb's ELC to enhance employee learning are sometimes mentioned within the context of the field of studies or coaching that need many weeks to complete (Clark et al., 2010, Raschick et al., 1998). Kolb's ELC is similar to alternative active learning approaches (Kolb, 2014) for comparison of active learning approaches. Among the active learning approaches, Lab-centric Instruction (Titterton, Lewis, & Clancy, 2010) and method homeward target-hunting Inquiry Learning (POGIL) used in computer learning is closely associated with Kolb's ELC. Organizations review the ideas developed by David Kolb and initiate new ideas in learning sessions in three ways:

1) Facilitate to focus on a lot of specific learning sessions for individuals, we tend to operate with.

2) Facilitate coaching and training exercises that meet up with the particular approach.

3) Facilitate to change any learning intervention for individuals in line with the four stages.

One way to realize the impact of practising this theory is through ready-made eLearning content and custom-made e-learning. Each caters to various needs and learning designs. As an example, most ready-made content is created from short, sharp one to five-minute sessions whereas custom-made e-learning content will gives mixed answer online solutions or as online coaching with presenter, animation or motion graphic content to cater different preferences. The studies revealed it is a more effective rather than a ready-made approach (Konak, Clark and Nasereddin, 2014).

 

Advantages

  • Each stage of the model is related to a special most well-liked learning vogue. This ensures that each one most well-liked learning designs area unit used as you step through the model.
  • The model provides a mixture of ancient teaching and active learning.
  • The model forces the teacher to use a lot of tools than merely broadcasting their data to the scholar.

Disadvantages

  • The totally different learning designs are beneficial, and it is often troublesome for a trainer to accommodate a variety of learning techniques during a cluster state of affairs.
  • It isn't an invariably obvious way to apply the model within the world. The teacher isn't any longer broadcasting their data, and they have to understand their students already to tailor the coaching to them.
  • The continuous cycle approach to learning might not be ideal if you wish to require associate communication for some purpose.


Conclusion

Kolb’s learning cycle consists of four stages of action that have to be compelled to happen for effective learning with feeling, observing, thinking, and doing. The model additionally describes totally different learning designs, acknowledging that as distinctive people, individuals preferred learning in several ways. The most effective organizations invest within the coaching and development of their workers. A number of these coaching can happen through courses and accreditations and the usual approach we train individuals may be to transmit data to them via a presentation. The experiential learning cycle allows to consider new ideas, place method of continuous analysis and reflection resulting in enhancements and improves the professional development of employees(London and Manual, 2011).



References

Baker, Kolb, D. A., Jensen, J. (2002) Conversational Learning: An Experiential Approach to Knowledge and Creation. Westport: Quorum.

Kolb, D. A. (1984) Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.

Kolb, D. A. (2014) Experiential Learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Upper Saddle River: Pearson Education. 

Kolb, D. A. and Boyatwzis (1999) Experiential Learning Theory: Previous research and new directions. Cleveland: Case Western Reserve University.

Konak, A., Clark, T., Nasereddin, M. (2014) 'Using Kolb's Experiential Learning Cycle to improve student learning in virtual computer laboratories', Computers and education, Elsevier. 22. pp 11-22. Available at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2013.10.013

London, Manual, (2011) The Oxford Handbook Of Lifelong Learning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

McLeod, J. (2010) 'The effectiveness of workplace counselling: A systemic review', Counselling and Psychotherapy Research, 10, pp.238-248.

Titterton, N., Lewis, C. M., Clancy, M. J. (2010) 'Experience with lab centric instruction', Computer Science Education, 20, pp 79-102.

Comments

  1. Kolb suggested that there was a learning cycle, which could be used to help people reflect on their learning. The cycle includes four processes that need to take place for effective learning.
    for your understanding, practical examples for the Kolb’s Learning Cycle:

    Learning a new software program:

    Concrete experience -Learning a new software program
    Reflective observation -Focusing on how to use the latest software
    Abstract conceptualization -Reading the manual to get a better picture of what was achieved
    Active experimentation – Jumping in and doing it as what conceptualization you abstract

    ReplyDelete
  2. Kolb’s learning cycle consists of four stages of action that have to take place for effective learning to have taken place; feeling, observing, thinking, and doing. The model also describes different learning styles, acknowledging that as unique individuals, people prefer to learn in different ways.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Interesting article... However, as per Greenway, R. 2004 Article, and although Kolb’s theory is widely accepted and has its use for improving performances especially in higher education, there are a number of problems with the model.

    The problem here is that the experiential learning model does not apply to all situations. Another problem is that Kolb’s theory provides only limited number of factors that influence learning. It doesn’t explain psychodynamic, social, and institutional aspects of learning. It is important to have in mind that people differ in their learning type over time and over situations. Different approaches may be needed even to same person in different situations.

    The major critique to the Learning Style Inventory as a measurement of learning styles is lack of its objectivity, reliability and validity. Other complains are connected to its generalisablility as it has been used within a fairly limited range of cultures. For its broader use further studies are needed.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. This has been introduced by Kolb in 1984 and it's been used over decades. Kolb's experiential learning cycle now forms the heart of many training and learning events. It also describes the process for recording continuous professional development.David Kolb has extended his original work explore the different ways. Honey Mumford defined learning styles based on Kolb's work.The work on learning styles has been used and developed by many groups and institutions. Eg: University of New South Wales, Polytechnic Hong Kong, and Mason college.The International Consortium for Experiential learning organises its networking activities based on Kolb's work within four villages, two of which are concerned with community action and social change, and with personal growth, self awareness and group effectiveness.
      So we can explore and develop our own learning in an experiential way taking this as the base instead of sticking to the same as it is.
      References:
      Pickles, T. and Greenaway, R. (2004) 'Experiential Learning articles and critiques of David Kolb's theory',LearningWire.Available at:https://reviewing.co.uk/research/experiential.learning.htm#2

      Delete
  4. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Kolb suggested that there was a learning cycle, which could be used to help people reflect on their learning. The cycle includes four processes which Kolb suggested need to take place for effective learning. Concrete experience – This is doing something. In an early years setting, this could be teaching a child how to use some scissors.
    Reflective observation – This is reviewing and reflecting on the experience. Which elements of teaching the child were a success and which didn’t work so well?

    Abstract conceptualisation – This is about developing new ideas. This might mean thinking of activities involving cutting that link to a child’s interests, cutting out pictures of things that interest them, that will lead to discussion.

    Active experimentation – This is putting in to practice the new ideas. Carrying out the activity using the new ideas
    The cycle means that once we have carried out our new ideas, we reflect on these once more and so the cycle continues.
    In relation to professional development, it is thought that the cycle allows you to reflect on your practice, think of new ideas, put these in to practice and reflect on these; a process of continuous evaluation and reflection leading to improvements in practice.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Talent Management in 2021

Strategic Human Resource Management (SHRM) for a better work place and a better world

The ethical dimension of Human Resource Management